patching...
Breaking: Iowa City Weather Alert: Tornado Watch for Johnson County Until 10:00 P.M. Sunday »
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!
Local Voices
Soup to Go!

Processing Newtown (Blog)

I have had many, many conflicting thoughts rolling around in my head since last Friday and the news that 26 innocent people, including 20 beautiful children, were callously executed in Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown Connecticut.

Some say that the problem is gun control.

Some say that the problem is in providing care to the mentally ill.

Some say that their god is no longer allowed in school and this is the result.

Some say that the problem is in media glorification of people who commit heinous crimes.

But very few are saying that it is all of the above, which is what I believe.

Gun control: I cannot fathom for what purpose an average citizen needs a semi-automatic assault weapon. These are weapons designed to push out maximum firepower over a minimum time frame. They are designed for warfare and are used to strafe bullets over a large area as quickly as possible. The only animals that these weapons are designed to hunt are humans.

What civilian needs a military-grade weapon, especially one designed for the person firing it to not have to focus on the target, to really see what they are shooting? This weapon is designed to be pointed in a general direction and waved around, spraying ammunition everywhere. You don’t have to be a great shot or even a competent shot to kill something with weapons like this.

Compare guns to automobiles: Any citizen with the proper licensure can drive one, but very few people get to drive the cars that go 200 miles per hour. If a shotgun is a Ford and a handgun is a Lexus, a semi-automatic assault weapon is a race car which is only driven under very controlled circumstances – on tracks and under strict regulation. You wanna drive a race car? Go to the track and drive it, but not on city streets and not through playgrounds.

Mental health: The options for families dealing with the violently mentally ill are appalling. People are begging for help, pleading with doctors and hospitals and getting nowhere. Getting help for a family member for a medical reason should be stigma-free and should be available to all who need it. There needs to be a comprehensive overhaul of our mental health programs, one designed to help patients and their families so that they aren’t living in fear.

I am not in favor of sterilizing or lobotomizing patients with mental illness. I don’t suggest that we confine them in medieval insane asylums. But there should be safe residential options for people who require more care than their families can provide safely. And I don’t want to suggest that every person who suffers a bout of depression or struggles with anxiety needs to be confined – that is ludicrous. But the ones who have unpredictable violent tendencies? There needs to be options to keep them safe while undergoing treatment. And there needs to be many, many more facilities equipped to deal with the mentally ill who have demonstrated a capability for violence.

On god(s) in schools: As I understand it, if you are faithful to any religion or deity, then that faith goes with you everywhere you go, whether or not you speak it aloud. If your faith is always with you, then so is/are your god(s). If you have been taught to take comfort in an omni-present being, to you that being is always omni-present, whether or not your beliefs are spoken aloud or internally. Whether or not prayer is allowed in public schools seems to be a moot point if one lives life with a prayerful heart.

The media: I get that the world turns to the media to learn about what is going on, that we frame our very lives through the context of “Where were you when?” but forever elevating the perpetrator of crimes over the significant loss of the victims, their families, and their community is inexcusable. It is a sad, sad thing to know that there are teens out there who can more readily name gunmen from mass shootings and serial killers than they can name the Presidents and Vice Presidents of the United States. Perhaps J.K. Rowling got it right when she wrote that nearly everyone who had lived through the first reign of Voldemort refused to name him. Don’t let a name have that kind of power; don’t let a crime define a generation.

We cannot be silent on any of these issues any longer. As a nation, our capability for resiliency is large, but it just shouldn’t have to be large enough to bear the weight of these 26 souls.

Patch_comments_icon

Deb Belt

12:35 pm on Tuesday, December 18, 2012

Courtenay: Excellent points raised in a thoughtful manner. I'm wondering if you've talked with your kids about the shooting, have any advice for parents? Thanks

Reply
Comment_arrow

Courtenay Baker-Olinger

9:38 am on Wednesday, December 19, 2012

Hi, Deb,

As of right now, my children do not know about this tragedy -- they are quite young (7, 5 and the twins are 20 months). I shielded them from media coverage through the weekend and have asked them if they talked about anything "scary" at school and, so far, they have not heard anything.

If they do hear about it, I intend to talk with them about how their school is a very safe place, how their teachers are trained to take care of them, and, most importantly, how things like this don't happen everywhere all the time. I'm pretty sure that my five-year-old will not worry too much as she isn't a worrier by nature. But my seven-year-old is, so any discussion I have with him will be a the first in a series of long-term discussions about safety and mental health.

I think that the best thing we can do is to tell our children that it is OK to be safe and that it is also OK to feel afraid, but that the fear doesn't have to eclipse the joy we have when we go out in the world.

Travis Biggs

8:18 am on Wednesday, December 19, 2012

What a terrible article. The first paragraph alone is enough to make my head spin with its inaccuracies. Do you have ANY idea how an 'assault weapon' differs from a hunting rifle, handgun, or similar firearm? Your comments make it very apparent that you do not. A semi-automatic weapon can only fire as fast as a person can pull the trigger, which is exactly the manner by which the vast majority of firearms operate. There are many semi-automatic shotguns, hunting rifles, handguns, etc., all of which offer the same basic functionality: one trigger pull, one bullet. This statement: "This weapon is designed to be pointed in a general direction and waved around, spraying ammunition everywhere" is one of the most ignorant things I have ever read. NO weapon is designed for such a purpose and I DARE you to take an 'assault weapon' out to a safe area and try something like this. Put a few people sized targets 15-20 feet away and then 'point in the general direction' and see just what happens. 10:1 odds say that not a single bullet finds your targets.

Next time, prior to considering writing an article like this, do some basic research and try to actually understand a topic before writing about it.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Courtenay Baker-Olinger

9:43 am on Wednesday, December 19, 2012

Hi, Travis, this is actually a blog post, not an article. I am not a journalist.

I will admit that I am not well-versed in weapons, but that does not change my feeling that weapons that can fire more than 10 or more rounds before needing to be reloaded are inappropriate for civilian use.

And this is technically my first paragraph, "I have had many, many conflicting thoughts rolling around in my head since last Friday and the news that 26 innocent people, including 20 beautiful children, were callously executed in Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown Connecticut." I do not see any factual inaccuracies that should make your head spin.

Comment_arrow
Patch_comments_icon

Todd Richissin

10:05 am on Wednesday, December 19, 2012

Travis: Good of you to respond, but it's easy to pick at someone else's feelings and solutions. Do you have anything of substance to offer for how to prevent these kinds of tragedies? I, like Courtenay, and like most thoughtful people, are a bit sick of blanket defenses of weapons -- unless they come with some thoughtful comments on the problem at hand. The problem here is not the definition of an assault weapon. The problem is how weapons were used against the most innocent of people -- children -- and how we can help prevent more innocent lives lost.

Comment_arrow

Julie Kirby

10:11 am on Wednesday, December 19, 2012

What an insulting comment, Travis.

Perhaps you didn't consider the high-capacity magazines that were being used during the killing spree. Perhaps you didn't consider that many of the victims were shot 2-7 times. Perhaps you didn't consider that the entire killing spree lasted only ten minutes and investigators still don't have ANY idea how many shots were fired.

So much for your statement: "Put a few people sized targets 15-20 feet away and then 'point in the general direction' and see just what happens. 10:1 odds say that not a single bullet finds your targets."

What I gather from your comment is that your *right* to own unlimited lethal firearms and unlimited high-capacity magazines trumps the lives of twenty-six people in Newtown, CT.

Before you jump on me about being *ignorant* about firearms, my husband taught me to shoot a Taurus 9mm, a Ruger .38, a .233 rifle and a 50 cal. muzzleloader. Consider that next time you try to talk down to the *little lady."

Leave a comment