patching...
Update: Sign up here for our free daily e-mail newsletter filled with the news, events calendar, and local announcements you need to know. »
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Grudge Match 2014: Does Chet Culver Deserve a Second Shot as Iowa Governor?

Former Iowa Governor Chet Culver, a Democrat, is considering running in the 2014 election to reclaim the seat he lost to current Iowa Gov. Terry Branstad, a Republican.

 

Chet Culver had his shot as Iowa governor but was voted out after one term.

Maybe it's all the election hoopla that surrounds Iowa, or he's just a glutton for the punishment of the campaign trail, but Culver says he is thinking about throwing his hat back in the ring for the 2014 election. 

“I’m going to certainly explore the possibility of putting my hat back in the ring, but I haven’t made a decision at this point,” Culver told the Des Moines Register last month.

The 46-year-old Democrat served as governor from 2007 to 2011. He was defeated by current Gov. Terry Branstad, a Republican, who served as Iowa governor from 1983 to 1999 and again from 2011 to the present.

Culver is currently working on the Chet Culver Group, a renewable energy and infrastructure consultancy, which he founded. He is living in West Des Moines with his wife and children.

If he does run, he'll have to do it without his former lieutenant governor, Patty Judge, who said she isn't interested. And, his opponent is also up in the air. Branstad hasn't made up his mind about seeking re-election.

But, really, this isn't about them. It's about us and what we want.

So, what say you, dear reader? Does Culver deserve to reclaim Terrace Hill and be Iowa's governor once again?

  • Does Chet Culver Deserve a Second Shot as Iowa Governor?

    (Voting has been closed for this question)
    • Yes. (Tell why in comments)
        3 (20%)
    • No. (Tell why in comments)
        11 (73%)
    • Not sure. (Tell why in comments)
        1 (6%)
    Total votes: 15
  • Your vote will only count once. This is not a scientific poll. View Results Vote!
Related Topics: Patch Poll and chet culver

Kurt B.

6:59 am on Sunday, January 6, 2013

I personally hope he doesn't run. One suggestion for anyone who runs in the future - no matter which party, no matter how experienced : have the person go through Dave Ramsey's financial class. We have too many elected officials that don't understand how to keep us out of debt. The over-spending is horrendous. We've got to get this entire country back to the basics : spending must be less than the incoming revenues. Don't just raise taxes to try and cover up the issue .... instead, actually spend less than what the income is. Period.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Nathan Hofstadter

9:11 pm on Sunday, January 6, 2013

wow Kurt, where is the overspending. I thought we had a surplus?

Joe Dygas

8:04 am on Sunday, January 6, 2013

I don't think it would be a very wise decision on his part. When politicians have completely failed in the performance of their elected duties such as Culver did, then it is very inappropriate to even consider them for a second turn at the apple. Culver should stay on the golf course or just watch TV.

Reply

Devious

9:22 am on Sunday, January 6, 2013

Just another has been politician that didnt serve his constituency well and is on a fundraising drive to pick up a few bucks. Stay home Culver and let someone that would take advantage of the position to serve the people of the state instead of the corporations.

Reply

maxine weimer

9:34 am on Sunday, January 6, 2013

Culver does not desreve another term period.

Reply

revdj

11:58 am on Sunday, January 6, 2013

I thought he did a good job, and was much better for Cedar Falls than Branstad.

Reply

Larry

12:58 pm on Sunday, January 6, 2013

Culver was much better for the 40000 state employees than Branstad. I voted for him twice before, I'd vote for him again.

Reply

Joe

7:54 pm on Sunday, January 6, 2013

When Culver was elected, we had nearly 3.6% unemployment. By the time Branstad defeated Culver, it was all the way up at 6.3%, almost a full 75% increase in unemployment. Most recently, unemployment rates have fallen to about 4.9%. Under Culver, we were running large deficits that required $500 million in property tax hikes. Under Branstad, this past year we ran an $800 million surplus after cutting taxes. I think these numbers alone speak for themselves; Culver would get a no vote from me.

Reply

Nathan Hofstadter

9:09 pm on Sunday, January 6, 2013

Joe, where are the 200,000 jobs that branstad promised? I think these numbers speak for themselves. And to blame Culver for the recession? Priceless.

Reply

Linda Carpenter

7:54 am on Monday, January 7, 2013

I think Chet Culver was a good governor. He valued education and was a positive leader. I would vote for him again.

Reply

PAM

9:51 am on Monday, January 7, 2013

I will vote for anyone but Branstad, didn't like him before and don't like him again. He tries running Iowa like a dictator,we call him BRAINDEAD.

Reply

Greg Tagtow

11:46 am on Monday, January 7, 2013

funniest thing I have heard in a long time.

Reply

James

12:24 pm on Monday, January 7, 2013

I would not Vote for Culver. His Ijobs was the biggest wast of tax dollars. It only proved temp work to re buld or build newer buildings for Cities. It did not creat any new jobs, it only kept his Union buddies working.
Second, Ive met the man, and he has the fakest personality of anymore. Not Sincere by any means. Only out to help himself.
At least Branstad cares for Iowa, where as Culver only cares for himself and his Union friends

Reply

Warren Potter

6:43 pm on Monday, January 7, 2013

Our flood insurance would go up with sweaty Chet Culver back in office.
Larry I have to ask was that a tongue in cheek statement? Chet is a Democrat of course he was better for the public unions. Revdj would you care to elaborate on how ole Chet was good for CF? I'm not seeing it.

Reply

Tammy Andersen

9:06 pm on Monday, January 7, 2013

Remember Fred Grandy he should re run! Tom Arnold or Ashton Kuter run get some celebrities in office!!

Reply

Warren Potter

1:18 am on Tuesday, January 8, 2013

Celebrities? Are you insane? My God woman were talking about what is best for our states and our children's future and you want celebrities. Tammy you are the poster child for having some sort of test to be able to vote.
Celebrities she said lmao
I'm not sure if I'm more humored or angered by your remark. People like Tammy is why we have Obama as president and our country in the mess that its in. Don't hire a qualified person for the job hire someone with no qualifications except he can deliver a good speech and he looks good on the podium.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Nathan Hofstadter

10:16 am on Tuesday, January 8, 2013

Warren, I can give you a good reason why Obama is president. With your insulting, condescending post you are not helping your cause. Perhaps you should try making a point without insulting the audience you are trying to reason with. Reminds me of what an old debate coach used to tell me, when you start hearing the insults you know who is losing the debate...................

revdj

1:19 am on Tuesday, January 8, 2013

"People like Tammy is why we have Obama as president and our country in the mess that its in. Don't hire a qualified person for the job hire someone with no qualifications except he can deliver a good speech and he looks good on the podium." I agree! I didn't vote for Reagan, either!

Reply
Comment_arrow

maxine weimer

2:17 pm on Tuesday, January 8, 2013

I guess Nathaan dosen't have a sense of humor.............

maxine weimer

7:00 am on Tuesday, January 8, 2013

Tammy did you fall and hit your head really hard? You want someone like Lindsey Lohan running our state? Wow...you might as well elect Chuckie Cheese he would do a better job! And Warren..I agree with you, people with her mindset IS why Osama Obama is president!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Nathan Hofstadter

10:09 am on Tuesday, January 8, 2013

Maxine, a couple apologies are in order from you. Those comments were very insulting.

Warren Potter

2:19 pm on Tuesday, January 8, 2013

Nathan if I'm given a good argument to debate I will return with intelligent and heartfelt responses. If someone opens their mouth and drools out "we need celebrities in office" well I'll return with something equally intelligent, like I did. Maxine owes no one an apology. For the time being we still have the first amendment and she is free to speak her mind. The constitution does not protect your freedom to not feel insulted it does protect Maxines freedom of speech including to insult mental midgets like Tammy.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Nathan Hofstadter

5:33 pm on Tuesday, January 8, 2013

Well maxine and warren, I certainly see where you are both coming from. You have both said everything you need to say.

maxine weimer

2:21 pm on Tuesday, January 8, 2013

Nathan...I did not intentionally insult ammy. But if she really believes that Ashton Kutcher can run this state then she is either very, very naive or just plain out there. If I ofended her, I apologize but I haven't seen a comment from her to indicate that. I am an outspoken person who says what I feel, thats how I was built. And who made you the insult police anyway?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Nathan Hofstadter

8:43 pm on Tuesday, January 8, 2013

I got the badge through a mail order class.

maxine weimer

7:23 pm on Tuesday, January 8, 2013

Thank you Warren, I really don't think Tammy's comment needed protection, obviously Nathen thinks Kucther would be a good candidate.

Reply
Comment_arrow

maxine weimer

9:24 pm on Tuesday, January 8, 2013

Mail order badge..hummm it fits.

maxine weimer

7:57 pm on Tuesday, January 8, 2013

You were quick to jump to her defense, although she didn't need defending, so I just assumed you agreed with her.If not, then its my bad.

Reply

maxine weimer

7:58 pm on Tuesday, January 8, 2013

And by the way, you can call me whatever you want to, it dosen't bother me in the least.

Reply

maxine weimer

8:50 pm on Tuesday, January 8, 2013

Whatver floats your boat. I really don't see where you have any room to talk about someone else's name...Hofstadter, what kind of name is that?!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Nathan Hofstadter

8:06 pm on Wednesday, January 9, 2013

I have heard it is translated to, "Born in a barn or born by a barn." As my German is rusty, I cannot verify the accuracy of such statements. I'm assuming Weimer is also German?

Warren Potter

3:10 am on Wednesday, January 9, 2013

Oh no she didn't lol. Maxine you know better than that. People on our side are not allowed to question such things. You know that was a very racist ethnocentric close minded hate speech statement. :-)

Reply
Comment_arrow

Nathan Hofstadter

8:04 pm on Wednesday, January 9, 2013

warren, you may go ahead and question such things. You have my blessing!

maxine weimer

8:20 pm on Wednesday, January 9, 2013

That would be Airplane with Leslie Nielson...........

Reply

maxine weimer

3:21 pm on Friday, January 11, 2013

Whats wrong Nathen didn't you think I would know the movie?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Nathan Hofstadter

7:50 pm on Friday, January 11, 2013

nothing wrong Surely just busy workin'.

Maria Houser Conzemius

4:02 pm on Tuesday, January 15, 2013

Culver would be better than Branstad, but not by much. I don't like either one of them for governor in 2014. I would much prefer 1st District Congressman Bruce Braley as the Democratic nominee for governor. Chet Culver was defeated when he ran against Branstad the last time. In fact, the race was no contest. I'd like to give Bruce Braley a chance, since it looks like he's thinking seriously about running because, probably in part, Congress is, at present, dysfunctional.

Reply

Leave a comment